P-Asserted-Identity of Callee ID on A leg? (in 183 packet)

[djzort]

setting sip_cid_type=pid and/or caller-id-type=pid seems to only affect the B-leg (the person being called i.e. the callee)

the A leg seems to always receive remote-party-id in 183 responses. the above two settings seem to have no impact. The sip_cid_in_1xx variable turns remote-party-id off/on in the 183, but its still rpid not pid.

any suggestions on how a P-Asserted-Identity (pid) might be provided to the A leg (caller)

 

[djzort]

If i do a <action application="set" data="sip_h_P-Asserted-Identity=sip:... this sets it in the B-leg not the A leg

 

[djzort]

<action application="set" data="sip_ph_P-Asserted-Identity=

seems to do the trick...

 

[DigitalDaz]

So is this solved?

 

[djzort]

In probably the worst possible way... but yeah

 

[kidjake28]

Forgive me but this doesn't have to do with losing caller id when parking does it?

 

[djzort]

Yes, im very close. See my post in http://www.pbxforums.com/threads/need-guidance-for-an-office-incoming-calls.851/#post-3667

 

[DigitalDaz]

@djzort Is this not as simple as adding sip-cid-type with pid to the internal profile??

 

[djzort]

@djzort Is this not as simple as adding sip-cid-type with pid to the internal profile??

From my first post:

setting sip_cid_type=pid and/or caller-id-type=pid seems to only affect the B-leg (the person being called i.e. the callee)

I am testing making extension to extension calls which both use the Internal profile?

 

[DigitalDaz]

Sorry, my bad, not reading enough.

 

[djzort]

My expectation was that setting sip_cid_type=pid and/or caller-id-type=pid - would impact both A and B leg. Thats not the case.

Also sip_cid_in_1xx is entirely independant of the above.

On reflection is probably for the best that they only impact on leg, as you may have different handsets, so different requirements, on either leg.

The downside is that this isnt well documented (rather, isnt at all documented) and that generally speaking these control variables probably arent subtle enough.

 

[djzort]

See http://www.pbxforums.com/threads/parking-without-losing-caller-id.886/