For the last few weeks, I’ve been experiencing intermittent call issues on one of my smaller FusionPBX servers. After investigating, I discovered that my Fail2Ban setup had been disabled. This allowed repeated scans of my server from different IPs. At some point during the scanning, my GUI would become unresponsive, and outgoing calls would eventually fail until the scanning stopped or the server was rebooted.
While updating the jail.local file today, I noticed that Fail2Ban operates independently from the Event Guard process visible within FusionPBX.
At a high level, is Event Guard specifically designed to protect SIP traffic? If so, should Fail2Ban focus on securing other ports (non-SIP) to avoid potential overlap? I want to ensure these two processes aren’t conflicting with each other.
While updating the jail.local file today, I noticed that Fail2Ban operates independently from the Event Guard process visible within FusionPBX.
At a high level, is Event Guard specifically designed to protect SIP traffic? If so, should Fail2Ban focus on securing other ports (non-SIP) to avoid potential overlap? I want to ensure these two processes aren’t conflicting with each other.
Last edited: