Search results

We used RAID 6 over six drives. Performance was terrible

If you're small (as in you don't have your own blocks) , you are going to have to rely on your upstream provider to head off most of the volumetric stuff. If practical you may also want to switch to a deny all posture and only allow a whitelist of known clients, although this is easier said than...

Thank you so much! Exactly what I was looking for, I'll give it a try on my test server ASAP.

I've managed to set up a small BDR cluster. My challenge is that machine A is in datacenter A behind a firewall, and machine B is in DC B behind a firewall. Unfortunately the Public NAT IP needs to be set in each one of the SIP profiles and obviously they are unique to each DC. It would be...

I think I know the answer to this but I'm asking anyway. I'm separating the database layer from the Fusion PBX boxes for various reasons, so I'm going to have a small postgres BDR cluster that will handle the fusionpbx databases for several fusion instances. In order to accomplish this I'm going...

Check this out: https://chrismoore.ca/2018/10/finding-the-correct-pm-max-children-settings-for-php-fpm/

I use 4.4.9 with FS 1.10.2. Not the latest and greatest but it's what's worked. I honestly love using Fusion but the upgrade path is always a big problem. My philosophy has been when wanting to use a new version to build the server and then put new customers on it. I rarely upgrade in place, and...

Keep me in the loop on what you end up building. You may get a new customer ;)

No not port forwarding, I should have said nat mapping. On some routers they let you tune the timers on the nat mappings, so for example you may have a timeout on how long a UDP mapping is left open, etc. I'm not sure if that's exactly your problem as you're saying it takes a long time to...

All of my clients are behind various NAT devices and I've never run into this issue. I wonder if it's possible to try a different gateway or possibly tune the port mapping?

Maybe look at this: https://www.pbxforums.com/threads/phone-goes-busy.4930/

It would be interesting to know the use case for G729 these days. Most clients I run into have more than enough bandwidth for G711 and beyond. I know that sometimes people will use G729 hoping to cure problems that are jitter and packet loss based, which is obviously problematic.

Rogers is most likely going to install some sort of ATA themselves, there's no way they have a copper pair going to your house. I'm guessing you're in eastern/central Canada and bundling with internet and cell service, so it'll probably be some sort cable modem with an FXS port on it. So you'd...

I'd still just set two phones up with Ulaw and see if you get a different result. If not we can cross that off the list. I guess I'd be trying to get to something that works and then try to back track and figure out why Alaw doesn't. We're also booth assuming its a codec issue.

It would be nice to know what the payload type was changing from. I would be to try and change the acceptable codecs on your phones to both Ulaw and Alaw. My thoroughly uneducated guess is that there's something internally demanding Ulaw. As I said its just a guess but it's pretty trivial to...

I do this a little differently. I go to Dialplan=> Destinations=> And choose the "Outbound" button. Create an outbound destination with the number you want. Then when you're creating an IVR it should be available as one of the options.

Thank you, they still haven't published it in their main firmware page.

Any chance you can re-up 96.86.0.15 ?

Windows?? Is this for real?

Agreed